February 2012
Feb 29th
18,735 notes
Feb 29th
23,023 notes
Feb 29th
2,107 notes
Feb 29th
422 notes
Feb 28th
281 notes
Feb 27th
237 notes
Feb 27th
935 notes
Feb 27th
3,283 notes
Feb 27th
1,493 notes
Feb 27th
1,253 notes
Feb 27th
40 notes
Feb 27th
20 notes
Feb 27th
885 notes
Feb 27th
25,566 notes
Feb 27th
5,999 notes
Feb 27th
2,513 notes
Feb 24th
252 notes
Feb 24th
29 notes
Feb 23rd
172,215 notes
Feb 22nd
80,150 notes
Feb 22nd
507 notes
Feb 21st
553 notes
Feb 20th
290 notes
Feb 20th
900 notes
Feb 20th
18 notes
Feb 20th
195 notes
Feb 20th
104,102 notes
Feb 20th
2,437 notes
Feb 20th
356 notes
Feb 19th
120,302 notes
Feb 18th
1,648 notes
Feb 18th
236 notes
Feb 17th
224 notes
Feb 17th
7,111 notes
Feb 16th
2,713 notes
Feb 16th
27,900 notes
Feb 15th
336 notes
Feb 15th
183 notes
Feb 15th
177,709 notes
Feb 15th
1,974 notes
Feb 15th
169 notes
Feb 15th
8,439 notes
Feb 14th
26 notes
Hitchcock/Truffaut
A.H.: Well, the silent pictures were the purest form of cinema; the only thing they lacked was the sound of people talking and the noises. But this slight imperfection did not warrant the major changes that sound brought in. In other words, since all that was missing was simply natural sound, there was no need to go to the other extreme and completely abandon the technique of the pure motion picture, the way they did when sound came in.
F.T.: I agree. In the final era of silent movies, the great film-makers--in fact, almost the whole of production--had reached something near perfection. The introduction of sound, in a way, jeopardized that perfection. I mean that this was precisely the time when the high screen standards of so many brilliant directors showed up the woeful inadequacy of the others, and the lesser talents were gradually being eliminated from the field. In this sense one might say that mediocrity came back into its own with the advent of sound.
A.H.: I agree absolutely. In my opinion, that's true even today. In many of the films now being made, there is very little cinema: they are mostly what I call 'photographs of people talking.' When we tell a story in cinema, we should resort to dialogue only when it's impossible to do otherwise. I always try first to tell a story in the cinematic way, through a succession of shots and bits of film in between. It seems unfortunate that with the arrival of sound the motion picture, overnight, assumed a theatrical form. The mobility of the camera doesn't alter this fact. Even though the camera may move along the sidewalk, it's still theater. One results of this is the loss of cinematic style, and another is the loss of fantasy. In writing a screenplay, it is essential to separate clearly the dialogue from the visual elements and, whenever possible, to rely more on the visual than on the dialogue. Whichever way you choose to stage the action, your main concern is to hold the audience's full attention. Summing it up, one might say that the screen rectangle must be charged with emotion.
Feb 14th
186 notes
Feb 12th
4 notes
Feb 12th
2 notes
Feb 12th
12 notes
Feb 12th
12,099 notes
Feb 12th
717 notes
Feb 12th
135,243 notes